logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.06.14 2018고단928
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 13, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault, etc. against a driver) committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) in front of the “Eju store” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul., G taxi driving on the back seat of G taxi driver F (51). On the same day, at around 20:55, the Defendant was driving on the back seat of G taxi operating in the front seat of G taxi driver, she was driving on one occasion with the head of the driver’s seat at one time due to an outbreak without any particular reason while drunking.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. The Defendant damaged property at the same time and place as paragraph 1, and at G taxi owned by the victim F, the Defendant opened the front door of the cab and caused the above even gate to be covered by the rail installed on the road.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

3. On March 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of paragraph (1); and (b) was waiting in the office of the Dong-dong Police Station H located in the Dong-dong Police Station in Gyeonggi-gu, U.S., U.S. on March 13, 2018, the Defendant: (c) took a bath to the mitigated police station belonging to the Dong-dong Police Station in Busan-gu, U.S., U.S., where the investigation was completed, stating that “I must do so; (d) was frighting to the above I; and (e) was fright to the shoulder of the above I; and (e) was frighting the Defendant to keep plastic storage.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers I and J concerning criminal investigation.

4. The Defendant damaged public goods by drawing up plastic storages on the tables for civil petitioners at the same time and at a place as paragraph 3, and cutting them into the floor, and cutting them into the tables for civil petitioners.

This is the defendant.

arrow