logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.02.16 2015고단470
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, violation of the Road Traffic Act due to damage to each fault.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 26, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (competence) in the Jinwon District Court’s Jinju branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Changwon Prison on March 27, 2015.

[2015 Highest 470] The defendant is under a divorce lawsuit with the victim since January 2015, as the married married couple C (V, 38 years of age) and around October 1998.

On May 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 00:55 on May 3, 2015, at the e station operated by the injured party D, on the ground that the injured party does not open the main entrance to the Defendant; (b) destroyed the entrance door door door 62,00 won at the market price of the injured party, which is the victim’s possession; (c) opened the entrance, and (d) opened the entrance, and opened the entrance, the injured party suffered injury, such as dump, etc. in need of treatment for about 14 days, by leaving the victim’s face face, which the injured party is going to go to the Defendant.

[2015 Highest 871] The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a car with F-Nest.

On May 3, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 03:20 on May 3, 2015, and led to the front of the Handong apartment 103, which is located in the Pyeongtaek-dong at the time of Jinju, to the direction of the entrance at the apartment complex inside the apartment complex at the speed of about 30km per hour.

At the time, a lot of vehicles are parked inside the apartment complex, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to see the front door as a person engaged in driving business and to operate the steering and steering system accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded with the part of the lower part of the lower part of the Hrocketing car owned by G, the victim G, who was parked on the right side of the road due to the negligence of the business, which was driven on the right side of the road, which was driven by the Defendant without any negligence at the front of the road, to the upper part of the lower part of the passenger car of the Defendant. This is therefore attributable.

arrow