logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.05.04 2016고단352
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) up to 09:20 on February 17, 2016, from around 09:20 to 09:50 on the same day, the Defendant set up the “E store” for the operation of the victim D in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yongsan-gu, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, posted a signboard to the other customers, seated on the floor, frighted, frighted, frighted, frighted on the main entrance.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

"2016 Highest 747"

1. On October 13, 2015, at around 10:00, the Defendant was drunkly drunk in Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2’s “E main store,” and without any justifiable reason, she saw that the Defendant she she she she was at the time to she was her to she with a shoulder and head, and she was her to her so that she was she was she at the time when she was her to she was she, and she was she was her to her so that she was her to her, who was her to her, and the victim was her to her, who was her finger and her to her to her so that the victim was her finger and her to her to her, thereby causing an injury on the number of days of treatment.

2. Obstruction of business and damage to property;

A. On December 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 10:30 on December 31, 2015, the “E main store” operated by Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2 Victim D (Woo, 52 years old); (b) from this point, the Defendant left two main standing signboards installed at the main store entrance to prevent the Defendant from entering and leaving the entrance at the above main store; and (c) up to 500,000,000 won in the market price of the vehicle; and (d) interfere with the Defendant’s main store business operation for about one hour by force, such as harming the disturbance by taking advantage of force.

B. On January 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 16:20, at the above “E main point,” the Defendant 15 minutes of the disturbance, such as: (b) prior to this, the Defendant’s junk’s employees, who had been drunkly driven at the above main point, leaving the entrance and exit of the Defendant; and (c) continued to set the main entrance due to the wooden erosion, which he was in possession of the Defendant, for the duration of approximately 15 minutes by force.

arrow