logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.09.30 2014고단277
무고
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On November 5, 2013, the summary of the facts charged was that C had forged a promissory note in the name of the Defendant (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) and a power of attorney (hereinafter “the instant power of attorney”) on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant signed the agreement with C on November 5, 2013; (b) the issuer column of the promissory note and the delegation column of the power of attorney; and (c) subsequently, C did not have forged the promissory note in the name of the Defendant.

Nevertheless, on December 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the Cheongju Police Station civil petition office of the Cheongju Police Station of the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si; (b) for the purpose of having C take criminal punishment, the Defendant filed a false complaint with the police officer stating that “A, the complainant, has not written his/her name and affixed his/her seal on a promissory note and a power of attorney; (c) on November 2013, the issuer column of the promissory note form and the letter of attorney on a private document, the name of the complainant has been stated “A” and then forged the said document with his/her own name affixed; and (d) on November 13, 2013, the Defendant submitted a promissory note and a power of attorney at the office of the notary public E-office located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and submitted a false statement to the police officer in charge of the civil petition stating that “A had a notary public enter false facts in the authentic copy of a notarial deed.”

2. The Defendant’s assertion of defense counsel did not state his name and affix his seal on the promissory note and the power of attorney, and thus, the Defendant did not submit a false statement. Even if the Defendant had written his name and affixed his seal on the Promissory Notes and the power of attorney, since C did an act of stating the amount beyond the scope of delegation, etc., the Defendant did not exaggeration the circumstances or did not amount to the degree of direct impact on the nature of the crime, considering the existence of some false facts as a whole. Therefore, the crime of false accusation may be established.

arrow