The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the proxy of this case was prepared by the defendant, and the judgment of the court below is erroneous in misconception of facts.

2. On the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below found that the defendant, etc. forged the power of attorney with two copies of the certificate of personal seal impression affixed to the complaint of the related civil case (Yancheon District Court 2012No. 6720), but the defendant, etc. issued the letter of attorney with two copies of the certificate of personal seal impression affixed to the blank, but the defendant, etc. stated the amount of 6 million won on the letter of attorney as stated in the document and stated the amount of 23 million won in the letter of proxy and affixed the seal seal impression at the third day of the court of first instance. However, the court below found that there was no fact that the amount of the letter of attorney stated in the letter of attorney as stated in 23 million won and affixed the seal to the letter of attorney at the time of the third day of the court of first instance, but it did not coincide with C and the defendant's statement that the letter of attorney at the time of the second instance and the letter of attorney at the time of the third day of the court of appeal.