beta
Text
1. The defendant's office of the notary public against the plaintiff.
Reasons
Basic Facts
A. D’s notarial deed in the name of D and the notarial deed in the Plaintiff’s name 1) The Plaintiff’s husband, the Plaintiff’s husband, supplied E with solar sun-lights, and E paid approximately KRW 160,00,000 to E, which was introduced by D, around September 2015. Since E was not provided with the above solar-lights, E demanded D to guarantee the provision of solar-lights on November 3, 2015.
Accordingly, D made it possible to set up and set up a notarial deed to E in relation thereto, signed and sealed its name and address in the letter of delegation as to the commission of preparation of notarial deed, and delivered the power of delegation to E.
3) On November 3, 2015, the Defendant is the agent of D on the basis of the above power of attorney, and the notary public C approves that “D is liable for the payment of KRW 50,000,000 to the Defendant, and shall repay the said debt in full by November 7, 2015, and the interest rate shall be at the rate of 20% per annum, and if it is impossible to perform the obligation immediately, it shall be recognized that there is no objection even if compulsory execution is conducted,” the notary public C office written on November 3, 2015 (hereinafter “notarial deed in the name of D”) shall be the authentic deed of debt repayment contract (Quasi-Loan for Consumption) No. 507 (Quasi-Loan for Consumption) concluded on November 3, 2015.
4) Since then E requested D to prepare a notarial deed in the name of the plaintiff in the same content as D’s notarial deed.
5) D) The proxy letter letter letter for the commission of preparation of authentic deed contains the Plaintiff’s name and address in the proxy letter box, affixed the Plaintiff’s seal imprint, and signed and sealed the Plaintiff’s seal imprinted (hereinafter “instant proxy letter”).
(6) On November 24, 2015, the Defendant issued a certificate of the Plaintiff’s personal seal impression to E on November 6, 2015. On November 24, 2015, the Defendant is the Plaintiff’s agent based on the instant power of attorney, and the Plaintiff’s agent to C is liable to pay KRW 550,000,000 to the Defendant, and on November 7, 2015, the Defendant approved that the Plaintiff is liable to pay KRW 550,000 to the Defendant.