Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Criminal facts

Defendants and complainants are the believers of the G church in the People's Republic of Korea, and H is the temporary pastors of the G church, and I is the head of the G church.

I, around July 2, 2012, had been directly engaged in the work of H pastor as a member of the G church, but H did not recognize H as a member of the G church, along with the Defendants, who followed H, on the ground that H did not follow his direction.

Accordingly, the Defendants, at around 11:00 on January 6, 2013, trying to deliver a worship listed on the top in order to read 30 or more teachers, the Defendants: (a) when I, the head of the above church, “H pastor, who was unable to obtain permission from the labor association, is not a member of the G church; (b) Ha, the wife of H pastor, followed the noise, and avoided the disturbance; and (c) on the ground that the J, the wife of H pastor, in the order of the worship, led the son while going to go to the son while going to the son while going to the son in the order of the worship, Defendant A and B, who continued to go to go to the son’s hand, did not go to the son while going to the son’s hand; and (d) Defendant A, who continued to go to talk with the microphone used by H pastor, did not interfere with the conclusion of the above Defendants, and did not interfere with the Ha’s will to the Ha, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E and H;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. A written request for the cancellation of ice ice ice, a temporary pastor, a written petition for ice ice ice and a meeting minutes;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 158 and 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (Amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014);

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the provisional payment order

1. Where a person, other than a delegated wood officer, who has taken the regular procedure, has carried out the regular procedure against the resolution of the party council;