All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not interfere with the worship of a pastor on January 6, 2013, and thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, even though the Defendants did not interfere with the worship of a pastor H on January 6, 2013.

The argument is asserted.

2. Determination

A. The Defendants of the facts charged in the instant case and E, the complainant, are the believers of the G church located in the G church F of the Chungcheongnam-gun, while H is the temporary pastor of the G church, and I is the head of the G church.

I, around July 2, 2012, had been directly engaged in the H pastor as a member of the church in G church, but H was not recognized as a member of the church in G church on the ground that H did not comply with his/her instructions.

Accordingly, the Defendants, at around 11:00 on January 6, 2013, trying to deliver the worships listed on the top of the church with the 30 members of the said church when H, a non-permanent pastor, intends to do so with the said members of the church, he/she is not a member of the G church because he/she did not obtain permission to do so from the labor union.

When “Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

B. The lower court found guilty of the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

(c)

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below's judgment and the court below's judgment, all of the circumstances stated by the court below are recognized.

In addition, E is from the investigative agency to the court of original trial.