logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.12.21 2016가단15862
손해배상(기)등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: 60,000,000 won and 40,000,000 won among them, from May 15, 2007, and 20,000,00 won.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C is a person who was engaged in real estate brokerage business under the trade name “E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” from Busan to September 2001, and was closed on or around December 2015, and Defendant C is a wife of Defendant C, who was working as a broker assistant of Defendant C.

B. The Defendant Association concluded each of the following mutual aid agreements with Defendant C (hereinafter “instant mutual aid agreements”).

Common contents of mutual aid: Limit on compensation for losses suffered by the parties to a transaction where a real estate broker who has subscribed to mutual aid agreements has intentionally or negligently inflicted property damage on the parties to a transaction while acting as a real estate broker: The scope of losses covered by the defendant Association shall be equivalent to the fault ratio of the parties to mutual aid in the amount which the members incurred property damage on the part of the parties to mutual aid while acting as a real estate broker. The aggregate of the amounts of mutual aid agreements, regardless of the number of clients or the number of brokerage contracts or the amount of damage inflicted on the parties to mutual aid agreement during the period of mutual aid agreement, shall not exceed the amount of mutual aid agreements stated in the certificate of mutual aid agreement (the "limit and scope of compensation" in the revised terms and conditions of November 18, 2009; hereinafter referred to as "the terms and conditions of mutual aid agreement of this case") 50 million won and the amount of mutual aid agreements of KRW 100 million,000,000,000,000 for each mutual aid agreement period.

On April 6, 2005, Defendant B introduced the F-owned residential building (Seoul Metropolitan City G Apartment 926 Dong 401, hereinafter “instant apartment”) to the Plaintiff as leased stores, and made the Plaintiff do so as to be F without any consent or delegation from F, and leased the instant apartment to the Plaintiff without rent of KRW 80 million.

arrow