beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B shall pay KRW 80,000,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from June 11, 2016 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant C is a person who was engaged in real estate brokerage business under the trade name “E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” from Busan to September 2001, and was closed on or around December 2015, and Defendant C is a wife of Defendant C, who was working as a broker assistant of Defendant C.
B. On September 5, 2013, the Defendant Association concluded a mutual aid agreement with Defendant C (hereinafter “instant mutual aid agreement”).
The amount of mutual aid coverage: The coverage period of 100 million won: from September 12, 2013 to September 11, 2014: Where a real estate broker who has joined a mutual aid agreement causes property damage to a transaction partner intentionally or by negligence while acting as a real estate broker, the compensation limit for losses suffered by the transaction partner: The scope of losses covered by the Defendant Association shall be the amount equivalent to the percentage of the fault of the transaction partner out of the amount that a member has incurred property damage to the transaction partner while acting as a real estate broker, and the scope of losses covered by the Defendant Association shall be the amount equivalent to the ratio of the fault of the transaction partner among the amount that the transaction partner incurred property damage in the transaction partner while performing a real estate intermediary act, and each client who suffered damage, regardless of the number of clients who suffered damage due to any brokerage accident that occurred during the period of mutual aid, or the number of amount of damages covered by the Defendant Association shall not exceed the aggregate amount of mutual aid coverage stated in the certificate of mutual aid
C. Around June 2014, Defendant B recommended the Plaintiff to rent a residential building F-owned (Seoul Metropolitan City G Apartment 912 Dong 1605, hereinafter “instant apartment”) (hereinafter “instant apartment”).
Then, on June 13, 2014, Defendant B prepared and delivered the so-called lease contract (the fact that F leases the apartment of this case to the Plaintiff in KRW 100 million without rent) with the Plaintiff on June 13, 2014, and the so-called monthly rent contract is paid to F (the fact that the Plaintiff pays rent in addition to KRW 20 million).