logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.30 2015가합46242
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 797,104,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from January 27, 2014 to May 30, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Conclusion of a contract was merged with Samsung C&T Co., Ltd. (formerly changed on September 2, 2015), and the trade name was changed to Samsung C&T Co., Ltd on the same day.

hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff" shall be referred to as "Plaintiff".

(3) The Do Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Co.”), the Do Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Co., Ltd.”) shall constitute a Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Co., Ltd.”) with the investment ratio of 51%,17%,12%, 10%, and 10

(2) On December 29, 2008, the construction project for the formation of a district A (2 sections) from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant construction project”).

2) The construction contract of this case (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

(2) The construction period under the instant construction contract is from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2012, and the construction amount is KRW 63,215,854,302.

3) The relevant provisions and the general conditions of the construction contract for the local government that made the contents of the instant construction contract (hereinafter “general conditions of the construction contract”)

B) The main contents of the contract are as indicated in the Attachment. B. On December 29, 2008, the first contract for the extended number of days of completion of the agreement (the original contract) as of the date of completion of the contract as of the separate contract date (the original contract date) concluded on December 30, 2012, and the Defendant changed the construction period to 72,327,256,000 on April 17, 2013 as of March 29, 2013, on the ground that the first contract was amended to 72,327,256,00 on April 180, 2013, the second contract was amended to 72,579,640,000 on March 28, 2013, the second contract was amended to 72,579,740,640,000 on June 19, 2013, 2014

2) On January 201, 2012, the Plaintiff would not claim indirect expenses for the extension of the construction period of six months. On December 31, 2011, the Plaintiff would be able to operate a factory on January 1, 2013, and if the factory operation breaks out due to our cause, would be able to assume all the responsibilities, such as legal, monetary, and intentional liability.

arrow