Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a public official working in the Sung-nam Branch of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office, and Defendant B was sentenced by the Seoul High Court on July 9, 2010 to imprisonment with prison labor for the offering of bribe, violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, etc., and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 14, 2010.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes by Defendant A;

A. around March 2008, Defendant A knew of B, who worked at a entertainment establishment, around 20 years prior to the commission of the crime, maintained the relationship between B and B frequently with B from the time when B performed an act related to the reconstruction of apartment in Songpa-gu Seoul.

B, while serving as a director of G Co., Ltd., a creative company run by F from around 2006 to receive money of KRW 200 million from F, and solicits H apartment reconstruction association and I apartment reconstruction association located in Songpa-gu Seoul to receive F to receive construction related to reconstruction from the Fund. On December 1, 2007, J, the vice president of the consulting company related to I apartment reconstruction association, filed a complaint against L association president, and is under investigation from the Seoul East Eastern District Public Prosecutor's Office M of Seoul Dong District Public Prosecutor's Office, and the investigator in charge is N, who is the investigator in charge, after receiving a proposal from the Seoul East East District Public Prosecutor's Office M from May 1, 2006 to June 10, 2007, who had worked in the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office from June 11, 2007.

Defendant

A was asked from December 2, 2007 to January 2008, B to the effect that “B, the president of I apartment reconstruction association, shall file a complaint of breach of trust against L, who is the head of I apartment reconstruction association, shall be in charge of investigation by the relevant Seoul Dong District Prosecutors’ Office M and N investigators, who shall be in charge of investigation and shall be allowed to receive a non-prosecution

After that, Defendant A is the prosecution investigators and China between February 2, 2008 and March 2008.