Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of eight months and fines of twenty thousand,00,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment with prison labor of six months and fines of fifteen thousand,00,000 won and Defendant C.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From December 12, 2008 to October 5, 201, during the period from December 12, 2008 to October 5, 201, a person working as the chairperson of the Housing Reconstruction and Improvement Project Association Establishment Promotion Committee (hereinafter referred to as the "tentatively named Promotion Committee"), and the chairperson of the Mining Market Promotion Committee (hereinafter referred to as the "Promotion Committee") with the approval of the luminous Market from October 6, 201.

A person selected as the president of the partnership at its inaugural general meeting on September 14, 2013 and selected as the president of the partnership after obtaining authorization to establish the partnership on October 25, 2013, and Defendant B, from December 2, 2007, is active as members of the promotion committee and the promotion committee.

On September 14, 2013, a director is elected as a director at the inaugural general meeting on October 25, 2013, and a director is elected with authorization to establish an association on October 25, 2013, and Defendant C is a person operating a removing company of P

1. In promoting apartment reconstruction, Defendant A and Defendant B’s prior acceptance of bribe, the selection of the contractor should be conducted by the reconstruction association through competitive bidding, and when concluding a contract for reconstruction with the contractor selected through competitive bidding, the matters concerning the removal construction of the existing building shall be included. Nevertheless, the Defendants were able to participate in the selection of the contractor by inserting the status of the chairman and the member of the said apartment promotion committee, and they were able to receive money and golf folds, etc. from the removal contractor, as consideration of convenience for the removal construction.

The Defendants’ co-principal defendants called “The right to select a construction project in connection with the reconstruction of the O apartment 10/11 complex and the right to select a removal construction work in return for the excessive amount of money.” The Defendants received from C a golf course in Permitted on October 9, 201, an amount of KRW 785,250, each of which is equivalent to KRW 785,250, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1) and Defendant 3,834,500, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes.