logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.03.14 2017고정325
폐기물관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the vice president of the Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon, who is the vice president of the B, and the defendant B is the corporation established to produce vessel engine parts due to the main work.

1. A person discharging industrial wastes shall dispose of wastes directly generated from his/her place of business, or entrust the disposal to a person who has obtained permission for his/her waste disposal business, a reporter of waste disposal, or a person who installs and operates

Nevertheless, on April 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was a stock company located in Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon, Daejeon; and (b) was disposed of by means of reclaiming to (e) D, through (i) waste collection and transportation business 19,360 kilograms of waste main chemical substance located in (i) the Defendant, as it is a chemical substance located in (ii) the chemical substance located in the form of public law, and (iii) the chemical substance located in (i) the waste collection and transportation business ; and (ii) the Defendant was permitted to dispose of waste main substance located in (i) the chemical substance located in (i) in (ii) the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Daejeon; and (ii) the chemical substance located in (ii) the chemical substance located in (ii) the form of public law, and (iii) the chemical substance located in (i) the chemical substance discharged

From that time until February 14, 2013, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form, dealt with approximately 1,056,970 g in total on about 50 occasions, without obtaining permission to dispose of the owner of the waste gas at the chemical shop, from that time to that of February 14, 2013.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. caused A to commit an act of violation as described in paragraph 1 at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant A;

1. An investigation report (a report on the confirmation of the sex of the owner who has discontinued the week);

1. Application of the statutes on the entrustment disposal contract for commercial wastes, the certificate of report on recycling wastes, and the above entrustment disposal contract;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 65 of the former Waste Management Act (amended by Act No. 13411, Jul. 20, 2015 and enforced July 21, 2016).

arrow