logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.02.14 2017고정323
폐기물관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the B Co., Ltd. located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the defendant B Co., Ltd is a corporation established to produce large pumps due to the main work.

1. A person discharging industrial wastes shall dispose of wastes directly generated from his/her place of business, or entrust the disposal to a person who has obtained permission for his/her waste disposal business, a reporter of waste disposal, or a person who installs and operates

Nevertheless, at around June 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was a stock company located in Geumsan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; and (b) was disposed of in accordance with Section (1) through (i) through (i) the Defendant’s waste collection and transportation company, which was permitted to dispose of waste gas due to chemical substance located in the chemical shop located in the form of public law, since it is a waste station located in the form of public law after drinking water and the light chemical substance discharged from Category B (State); (c) the Defendant, through (i) the waste collection and transportation company, could not dispose of waste gas; (iv) the Defendant, through (i) the waste collection and transportation company, transported 25,170 kilograms of waste gas station located in the Hasan-gun, Geumsan-gun; and (iv) disposed of it by landfilling it.

From that time until September 8, 2015, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of offenses in the attached Form, processed the product into approximately 3,702,110 km without obtaining permission to dispose of the product as a chemical shop located in approximately 153 times in total.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. caused A to commit the same act of violation as described in paragraph 1 at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. An investigation report (a report on the confirmation of the sex of the owner who has discontinued the week);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of the disposal of wastes between B (State), (i) E, and (N)D, the contract for disposal, the certificate of completion of the report on the recycling of wastes in D, the details of transfer for storage of each kind of contribution (related to UD), B (State) chemical store, and the details of transfer for storage of each kind of waste;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 65 of the former Waste Management Act (Amended by Act No. 13411, Jul. 20, 2015; Act No. 1341, Jul. 21, 2016).

arrow