1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 16, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Air Force and was discharged from military service on August 23, 2013.

B. On September 4, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that he/she applied for “brain color and hard disks” (hereinafter “the brain color part”), “the No. 1 disability”, “the No. 2 disability,” and combined two parts “the instant disability”).

C. After deliberation and resolution by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, on April 7, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision that the Plaintiff did not meet the requirements of a soldier or policeman wounded on duty, but constitutes the requirements of a soldier or policeman wounded on duty, and his/her disc does not meet the requirements of a soldier or policeman wounded on duty.

On May 23, 2014, the Plaintiff appealed and filed an objection against the Defendant on May 23, 2014. After review and resolution by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant decided on September 5, 2014 that the Plaintiff’s application against the Plaintiff does not meet the requirements of a soldier or policeman on duty, but falls under the requirements of a soldier or policeman on duty, and that the number of protruding escape from a protruding signboard does not fall under the requirements of a soldier or policeman on duty, and the number of persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation.

(hereinafter) Upon the Plaintiff’s filing of an objection, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement rendered a decision on April 7, 2014 (hereinafter “instant disposition”). 【Grounds for recognition】 Evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Nos. 1 through 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s primary claim 1) occurred in the course of performing the education and training for new soldiers, the concurrent and special skills training, the airfield boundary service and the equipment management service, and on May 6, 2013, the Plaintiff was used to install a signboard on the military unit’s fry and sent it to the hospital.