logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.12.09 2016구단7143
전공상 추가상이처 불인정처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff entered the Army on November 1, 1983 and was discharged from military service on May 8, 1986.

B. On November 5, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that the Plaintiff was different from the application for the “maegne, Maekne, and Maekne.”

C. After the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, on March 12, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision on the Plaintiff’s application as to the “satisfe typary typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typs

Then, the plaintiff was judged to be class 7 8205 as a result of the physical examination.

On December 5, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional recognition of his major, on the grounds that “Mari, knee, and knenee” was different, and the Defendant rendered a decision to recognize the status of a soldier or policeman wounded on January 22, 2016 and rendered the instant disposition to notify the Plaintiff.

E. The Plaintiff is seeking the revocation of the instant disposition only with respect to kneee “knenee” (hereinafter “instant award”).

F. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation seeking revocation of the Plaintiff’s decision on March 12, 2014 as No. 2014-Gu 2015, which was the Plaintiff’s 2014-Gu 32015 on the ground that the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation seeking revocation of the Plaintiff’s claim on October 14, 2015, which was dismissed on March 29, 2016, and the Plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed on March 29, 2016. The Plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed on July 22, 2016, after the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

(hereinafter referred to as “former Litigation”). 【Reasons for Recognition】 Entry of Evidence A No. 2, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the plaintiff was in military service on March 25, 1985 when he was in military service.

arrow