logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.07.12 2018나239
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's ground of appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance is that the defendants' joint tort claims damages, and such assertion is not different from the allegations in the court of first instance. Thus, even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance was delivered to this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for the court's explanation on the instant case is that the first instance court's judgment is identical to that, except that the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to the second to

(A) The Plaintiff asserted that the judgment of the first instance violated the principle of the independence of co-litigation, the principle of the subjective objective scope of res judicata, the principle of pleading, and the principle of the burden of proof distribution. However, the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court do not contain any error as alleged by the Plaintiff. 2. As such, each claim against the Defendants by the Plaintiff against the Defendants should be dismissed in entirety

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against it is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow