logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.23 2019나58799
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. The grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and a thorough examination of the evidence submitted in the first instance court to this court (the Plaintiff’s application for witness to the mother G was withdrawn) in full view of the evidence submitted in the first instance court, the fact-finding and decision of the first instance court are deemed legitimate

B. Accordingly, the reasoning of this court’s judgment is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow