logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.11.05 2014고합312 (2)
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to property damage, imprisonment with prison labor for five months for obstruction of performance of official duties, suspension of execution of two years, etc. by the Daejeon District Court on November 22, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 22, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

C On June 2, 2015, C, Co-defendant C, who was a co-defendant of the case, was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and two years of suspended execution, etc. on the grounds of violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (Good Practices). In addition, F, Co-defendant of the same case, was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3,00,000 on October 1, 2015.

On June 17, 2014, from around July 24, 2014 to around July 24, 2014, the Defendant operated a mutual sexual traffic business establishment of “E” on the 9th floor of the window of Changwon-si, and had the Defendant and F provide each customer with information by providing 50,000 won per day.

From July 22, 2014 to July 24, 2014, the Defendant, while working as an employee at the said sexual traffic business establishment, was aware of the fact that C, while employed a female employee with the nationality of the Thailand and received the payment from the male grandchildren and had the female employee and sexual intercourse with his/her female employee, he/she, despite being aware of the fact that his/her male grandchildren would receive money from his/her male grandchildren, provided guidance to each room where sexual intercourse takes place, and made it easy for the Defendant to commit the crime, such as fluoring the sea mare or cleaning the marina area to female employees.

Accordingly, the Defendant assisted C’s act of arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 Gohap78-2"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Co-defendant F and C's respective legal statements;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning C and G;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused, F, H, and I;

1. Each statement of the defendant, F, J, and K;

1. Written statement of enforcement officers;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records and application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 32 of the Criminal Act;

arrow