Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. From 10:00 to 12:00 on November 10, 2012, the Defendant opened a meeting to oppose the purchase of the apartment at the Ulsan-gun apartment in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, with 20 occupants, opening a meeting to oppose the purchase of the apartment at the discount of the apartment, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by publicly alleging false facts to the following facts: (a) despite the fact that the victim D requested the head of the above apartment sales office E to bring off the apartment discount and the pre-sale of the apartment to F, who is the head of the above apartment, although he did not request D to bring off the apartment discount and the pre-sale of the apartment at the end of the apartment sales office; and (b) even if D did not request D to carry out the real estate brokerage business, the F of the above female president

2. On November 11, 2012, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts to the effect that the victim D asked F, the head of the above apartment sales team E, the head of the apartment sales team, to take off the apartment discount and the pre-sale of the pre-sale of the pre-sale of the apartment, despite the fact that the victim D asked F, the head of the above apartment sales team E, the head of the apartment sales team, the head of the above apartment sales team, to take over the apartment discount and the pre-sale of the pre-sale of the apartment, while the residents 6, 7, and the occupants are heard.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the respective statutory statements of witnesses D, F, E, I, J, and K to the laws and regulations applicable;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the illegality is excluded in accordance with Article 310 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's statement contents are true, not false, and public interest.

However, in full view of the macroscopic statements of witnesses, the defendant is at the time of C apartment.