Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 5, 2015, around June 22, 2015, the Defendant, who interfered with one’s business, paid accommodation expenses for two accommodation persons from “Dururur” operated by the victim C in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, and four persons in excess thereof.

Accordingly, it is necessary to demand the victim to pay lodging expenses for additional personnel from the victim, and the victim "Chewing h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h.h.

As soon as possible, the victim's business was obstructed by force by leaving about 10 minutes of pedagogs in favor of the information room, such as cutting down the glass of the information room at the place.

2. On June 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) paid from the “DMoel” operated by the said victim on June 14, 2015; (b) however, (c) requested a refund to E using approximately KRW 400,000 to its employees; (d) it was rejected; (b) the Defendant died of Na. Ba.

In other words, it interfered with the victim's business by force by leaving approximately 20 minutes of pedagogs, such as cutting off the lag lad. ", la." and driving off the lag of the lag in the lag.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each written statement in C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of an event, a criminal investigation report, a criminal investigation report, and a criminal investigation report (in addition to a victim);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the same Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The amount of fine prescribed in the summary order, taking into account all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant, for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, has compensated the victims for damages and has agreed to the victims smoothly, and that the defendant could have been tried together with the Busan District Court 2016 High Court Order 3202.