A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 14, 2014, at around 00:57, the Defendant driven CEX car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 100 meters alcohol concentration of 0.105% without obtaining a driver’s license, from the public parking lot in Suwon-dong, Busan to around 00:59 on the same day, from the public parking lot in Suwon-dong, Busan to the road in the same Dong as 0:59 on the same day.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), did not hold a personal identification card as required by D throughout the Busan Southern Police Station, which was under the control of drinking driving, while informing D of his/her resident registration number, who was a pro-friendly E, who was going to the outside of his/her resident registration number, as if he/she were his/her resident registration number, and entered the above E’s personal information in a simple drinking-in entry column by accessing the PDA Transportation Computer Network, and presented the above E’s personal information to the Defendant, thereby presenting the PDA’s signature in the column for signature.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the signature of E for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), exercised the signature forged, as described in paragraph (2), to the above D, who was unaware of the fact, as if it were duly formed.

4. The Defendant forged private documents, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, stated that the Defendant is subject to cancellation of license on the driver column by using a verification-type pen on the report form on the state of the driver, indicating that he/she does not want blood collection, and then arbitrarily obstructed the Defendant’s name next to his/her name after indicating that he/she does not want blood collection.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged a copy of the report on the state-owned driver status statement in the name of E, which is a private document related to the certificate of fact.

5. The Defendant was forged at the time and place specified in paragraph (4).