A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 23, 2012, around 13:30 on October 23, 2012, the Defendant purchased options, interviewing smartphone 1 unit in an amount equivalent to 9.50,000 won at the market price of the victim E, a middle student C, and D stolen by the victim E, in front of the second exit of Changdong, Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and acquired options in an amount equivalent to 600,000 won at the victim’s market price, one unit of smartphone 1 unit, options in an amount equivalent to 600,000 won at the victim’s market price, one unit of smartphone 2,000,000 won at the victim’s H-owned market price, and 8.20,000,000 won at the victim’s market price, with knowledge of the fact that the victim’s E, a victim’s E, acquired samples at the victim’s price of 1,000 won at the victim’s price.

2. On September 27, 2012, around 20:50 on September 27, 2012, the Defendant acquired stolen goods after purchasing 80,000 won of the price knowing that the market price of the victim M that he/she stolen L, a middle student, was at least 90,000 won of the victim M, and observers of 90,000,000 won of the market price of the victim N, with knowledge that it is a stolen goods.

3. On November 24, 2012, around 18:19, the Defendant: (a) purchased stolen goods in front of the river basin in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, and (b) acquired stolen goods by purchasing hD smartphone 1 cost with knowledge of the fact that hD smartphone 1 cost is stolen in a gallon, which is equivalent to 900,000 won owned by a high school student, on the road.

4. On December 6, 2012, around 17:36, the Defendant: (a) purchased a stolen article in front of the river basin of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, and (b) acquired a stolen article by purchasing it at 30,000 won, knowing that it is a stolen charge, in the name of a victim who stolen by a high school student O, the market price of which is equivalent to 900,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against theO;

1. Each police statement about D, C, or L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The Criminal Act among concurrent crimes.