A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Performance of official duties or injury;

A. On November 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 21:20 on November 12, 2013, when driving a taxi in front of the Guro-si B apartment on the front of the Gumi-si B apartment; (b) did not speak at the exact destination while getting a taxi in front of the Gumi-si; and (c) requested the police officer to assist the taxi by driving a taxi with the E box located in the Gumi-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant expressed to the Defendant that “I would have to say that you will be able to conduct accurate son?” the Defendant, “I would have to do so, I would like to see why I would have to do so, why I would have to do so, why I would have to see, why I would have to do so, and how I would have to see, what I would have to see, what I would have to see, what I would have to do, and how I would have to die? I would like to see the face of F due to drinking. I would like to walk up the part of F. I would like to walk up the part of F. I would like to 39 years of age. I would like to am the victim F(39 years of age) who would be in need of two weeks’ right-hand bucking part of G's right-hand bucking part, and the victim G(5 years of age) would be able to give approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers, and at the same time injured the victims.

B. On November 12, 2013, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender for the crime of the foregoing paragraph (a), and subsequently, on November 23:30, 2013, at the parking lot for the said Estation, the Defendant assaulted H’s chests and knife on the patrol vehicle to take over the Defendant to the criminal charge of the previous U.S. police station by carrying the Defendant on the patrol vehicle, such as following: “Ye, flaf, n.e., n., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., k

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time, time, and place of Paragraph 1(b) above, the above H et al. are the Defendant at the back of the I patrol.