The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On June 8, 2020, the Defendant: (a) reported on June 22:58, 2020, at the C cafeteria located in Young-si B, and reported on 112, the Defendant: (b) was aware of the fact that the victim E belonging to the D District of the Tong Young Police Station, and the victim F, who affiliated with the same police officer, was bad in the process of confirming the Defendant’s personal information; (c) the proprietor of the said cafeteria, employees, and many unspecified customers were heard, and was aware of the victims of the instant cafeteria, including the following: (a) the victims of the instant cafeteria, she was aware of the mitigation of nitro, the developments leading up to the mitigation; (b) whether the victims were guilty; (c) whether the she was guilty of the crime; (d) where she was given the frighte, where she was given the frighte; and (d) she was sexually shot; and (d) she was sexual.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Offenses subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act;

C. On July 29, 2020, after the prosecution of the case, the victims cancelled their complaint against the defendant.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;