The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant entered a community hall to explain residents related to the industrial complex plan, and there was no intention to intrude into the building.

2. The lower court rejected the above assertion in its reasoning on the grounds that the Defendant had the same assertion as the grounds for appeal of this case, and based on its stated reasoning in the “judgment on the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion” of the judgment

The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is just, and there is no error of law in the misapprehension of legal principles as argued by the defendant, and this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit, in addition to the fact that the defendant was well aware of the fact that the door of the community community center was locked due to such f's failure to hold an explanatory meeting, and it is clear that the method of intrusion itself is contrary to the intention of the manager, etc., although this part of the facts charged is not a normal access through entrance and it is obvious that the method of intrusion itself is contrary to the intention of the manager.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.