logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2021.01.07 2018구합83499
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On December 16, 1968, the deceased B (C life, hereinafter referred to as the “the deceased”) was diagnosed with brain color and high blood pressure on December 14, 1989.

On June 7, 1991, the Deceased was approved by the Defendant for an occupational disease with respect to the brain cerebrovascular and high blood pressure, and received medical care benefits and disability benefits.

From April 29, 2018, the Deceased complained of respiratory difficulties and chest pains, and applied to the Seoul Jongno-gu University for Seoul Jongno University Hospital located in 101, but expressed its intention not to take active measures, and died at the same day.

A private person on the deceased’s death diagnosis report is written as “satisfics (satisfics) within the territory of the deceased.”

As the spouse of the deceased, the Plaintiff is in a relationship equivalent to brain fluoral and high blood pressure, the death of which was already approved as an occupational disease.

The defendant claimed to pay the bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses.

However, on July 31, 2018, the Defendant refused to give treatment to the deceased to cut urine by a urology, and considering that the blood and milch value at the time of the death showed a high level of opinion, it is difficult to recognize a urology between the death of the deceased and the occupational disease already approved.

The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition, on the ground that it was “the grounds for recognition” (hereinafter “instant disposition”). Inasmuch as there was no dispute regarding the payment of the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses (hereinafter “the instant disposition”). From No. 1 to No. 5, the evidence No. 3, and the overall purport of the pleading, the deceased’s assertion that the instant disposition is legitimate was legitimate, due to cerebral emerculation approved by an occupational disease, was able to move by using the wheelchairs, and the deceased was suffering from urology due to mathy, and thus, the deceased was suffering from urology due to considerable lack of movement.

In addition, blood supply is smooth due to high blood pressure approved for occupational diseases.

arrow