logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2021.01.08 2017구합83546
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. On August 7, 2017, the disposition that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on August 7, 2017 as the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral’s non-

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The deceased B (C life, hereinafter “the deceased”) worked as a mining source at the D Company from May 1, 1978 to March 1, 1981.

On November 5, 2014, the Deceased has been receiving the judgment of grade 1 (1/0) of pneumoconiosis C, and grade 3, such as pneumoconiosis impairment, due to cardiopulmonary function F2 (ney disability).

The cause of death (b)(c)(d) shall be only clear of the relationship with the medical person directly.

(A) A direct private person’s suffering of pneumoconiosis as referred to in subparagraph (b) (A) of the cause of the breathesis (c)(b) of the breathesis;

B. On February 23, 2017, the Deceased died on March 11, 2017 while hospitalized in a hospital in a furn and in direct salt with the right hand, and received treatment.

The reason for the death of the deceased stated in the death certificate shall be as follows:

(c)

The Plaintiff, a spouse of the deceased, claimed the payment of bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant.

However, on August 7, 2017, the Defendant is highly likely to have died from cerebral blood considering that the low blood pressure of the deceased was not directly related to the death, and that there was a temporary high blood pressure after the completion of dystin in the state that there was no other cause for the death of the deceased.

At the time of death, there was no respiratory disease related to pneumoconiosis, including the pulmonary disease.

Therefore, the death of the deceased is not recognized as a relation with pneumoconiosis.

The Plaintiff rendered a disposition to determine the amount of bereaved family benefits and funeral’s non-land benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that it is “the Plaintiff.”

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that cerebral blood was caused solely on the ground that the blood pressure of the deceased increased.

It shall not be readily concluded.

Before the death of the deceased, the pulmonary function of the deceased has been deteriorated continuously due to aggravation of pneumoconiosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, and chronic pulmonary disease, and resulting in a sudden shock.

arrow