1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 26, 2002, the deceased B (C livelihood, hereinafter “the Deceased”) caused an injury, such as thale color, spine shock, dratum, dratum, and erode, caused by the left-hand flaf, etc., due to a traffic accident in which the vehicle was entirely covered by a road protective wall during the taxi operation.

As to the above injury and disease, the deceased was given medical treatment until November 20, 2006 after obtaining approval for medical treatment from the Defendant, and was determined as Class 5 (as to the above injury and disease which have a significant obstacle to the function or mental function of the neurotic system, remaining from time to time).

B. On December 27, 2018, the Deceased died of pulmonary waste while hospitalized in the D convalescent Hospital and being receiving treatment.

(c)

The Plaintiff, a spouse of the deceased, claimed the payment of bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant.

However, the defendant on April 3, 2019, "the deceased is an elderly patient with a spathnosis, etc., and there is no substantial relation between the deceased's accident and the deceased's death, and the deceased's death.

The purpose of “the instant disposition” was to determine the amount of bereaved family benefits and funeral’s non-land benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the disease of cardio-cerebrovascular was rapidly aggravated as a result of the macro-driving restriction accompanied by cerebrovascular symptoms. As a result, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the disease of cardio-cerebrovascular was rapidly aggravated due to the natural progress. As a result, the Plaintiff’s ground for death caused the pulmonary conversation of the upper right part of the bru

Therefore, it is recognized that there is a substantial causal relationship between the deceased's existing approval and the death.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

(c)

Facts of recognition

1) In 198, the Deceased’s health condition was first diagnosed with urology in around 1998. From 2003 to her death, the Deceased was treated with urology and urology urology urology.

In addition, the deceased shall be from 2003 to 200.