The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The fact that the defendant reported to E is not false.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated in the judgment of the court below and the trial of the party, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, since the Defendant’s declaration that E raped the Defendant is false.

A. On May 6, 2014, the Defendant came to know E at 1:00 a.m. at 1:00 a.m., and sent contact information to E, stating “I are in the mind of four things, and I are in the day.”

After coming from the age club, the Defendant met E again, and even before the Defendant got off several times, and the Defendant interested at the time, at the time, the female employees and the price.

B. The Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant was melting the Red Sea (hereinafter “CU”) to E immediately before having sexual intercourse; and (b) stated that “The police was fluoring the Red Sea (hereinafter “CU”) as if the Defendant was fluoring and fluoring the PU, and was fluoring the PU,” and that the prosecution did not deem that E was fluoring the PU as the Defendant was fluor at the time when she was

There is no consistency in the statements, such as statements.

The Defendant did not take any action to delete the prevailing situation while wearing a red sea boom.

It is difficult to regard it as a victim immediately before rape.

(c)

The Defendant stated that E was “I, as satisfing, her clothes,” but the clothes in which the Defendant was suffering were teared or damaged.

(d)

After sexual body, the Defendant: (a) expressed in a cleaning agent B and E about the non-use of the Red Sea of mixed; and (b) stated that “a pregnant woman is allowed to engage in pregnancy; and (c) it is difficult to view the victim’s ordinary form immediately after rape was committed.

The defendant, together with her father and son, shall do so.