A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 27, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution on August 5, 2012 to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court, which became final and conclusive on December 5, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

In fact, the Defendant did not work for Pung, Co., Ltd., Ltd. 11 at the pressure level at the time of Busan Metropolitan City, but did not own any property and did not receive any income, so even if the Defendant purchased a vehicle with payment or loan using a credit card, he would not have an intention or ability to repay the card price or loan with C, and would have subscribed to purchase a vehicle by deceiving a credit card company, etc. as if he had an intention or ability to repay the price.

1. The Defendant, along with C, was issued with the victim’s slot Card Co., Ltd. a credit card (D) whose limit was raised by the victim’s slot Card Co., Ltd., as if he/she worked in the wind around July 5, 2012.

On July 10, 2012, the Defendant purchased the car at the Embryo car live location of the Co., Ltd., Ltd., which was located in the Embrye Eup in Masung-si (174), and settled KRW 15 million with the said lot card.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the card price because of the above situation.

The Defendant, in collusion with C, induced the victim, and caused the victim to pay the amount of KRW 15 million to Abandoned Motor Vehicle Co., Ltd., the Defendant acquired the same amount of pecuniary profit.

B. On July 11, 2012, the Defendant purchased an automobile from Hyundai Motor Branch in Seocho-gu, Seoul, 231, and paid KRW 5 million with the said lot card.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the card price because of the above situation.

The defendant in collusion with C is as above.