The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable (the imprisonment of eight months and the suspension of execution of two years, the order to attend a sexual assault treatment lecture for forty hours and confiscation).

2. Although there are no circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the Defendant’s recognition of all of the instant crimes, the lower court appears to have sentenced to punishment in full view of such circumstances, and examining all of the sentencing conditions in the instant pleadings, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, result of the crime and circumstances after the crime, and the circumstances cited by the Defendant and his defense counsel, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.