The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of execution of two years, the community service order of 80 hours, and the lecture order of sexual assault treatment of 40 hours).

2. Although there are circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as recognizing the Defendant to commit the instant crime, the Defendant again committed the instant crime since it has not yet been punished by a fine on November 17, 2016 (or April 10, 2017), despite the fact that there is no change of circumstances that may be newly considered in the trial, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s character and behavior and the Act on the Acceptance of Criminal Crimes, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable (in particular, the Defendant asserts that the period of the community service order is too excessive, but the Defendant’s community service order is not only necessary, but also the time of the lower court’s community service order is also reasonable), and the above assertion by the Defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.