The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable (the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months, suspension of execution of not less than two years, and the order to attend a sexual assault treatment lecture for not more than forty hours).

2. Although there are no circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as where the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, the lower court appears to have rendered a sentence by fully considering such circumstances, and there is no change in circumstances that may be considered in newly sentencing after the lower judgment was sentenced (the victim requested that the Defendant process the Defendant in accordance with the law while making a specific statement on the facts of damage at the time of detection of the instant case). In addition, even if considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s character and behavior, family environment, means of crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.