A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court on July 26, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 3, 2018.

B An employee of the Telecommunications Financial Fraud Group established a call center, etc. in Mean City, Bagui, Benpines, Mari-si, Bari-si, the Republic of Korea, misrepresenting the public prosecutor, prosecution investigators and employees of financial institutions, etc., making phone calls to unspecified victims in the Republic of Korea, i.e., one-time “comping”, one-time “comping”, one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time another-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time one-time another-time one-time one-time another-time one-time one-time one-time another-time one-time one-time another-time one-time another

On May 2016, the Defendant joined the foregoing organization in accordance with the proposal of the General Book B, and assumed the responsibility of prosecutor, prosecutory investigator, staff of financial institution, etc. from this point of time, and took charge of telephone.

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act may transfer or acquire a means of access unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act in using and managing the means of access;

According to the above public offering and role sharing, on July 12, 2016, the Defendant posted an advertisement with the aforementioned telephone financial fraud group’s staff, whose name is unknown, and posted an advertisement to the Internet Carbook “D” bulletin board, and reported it to and contacted E, “brates are sent in order to provide selective service.” On July 15, 2016, the Defendant received the means of access, such as physical cards and passwords connected to E companies’ banks, from around that time to April 19, 2017, and acquired a total of 121 means of access as shown in attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the defendant is the above telephone financial fraud group.