logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.23 2013구합21145
손실보상금
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for compensation for damages against the lands in attached Forms 1 through 4 are all included.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In the Land Survey Division, the address column of the M 1,063, N 1,657, P 510, P 750, Q Q 218 is indicated as being the situation of the S who is located in the “Seong-gun R” of the Gyeonggi-gun (hereinafter referred to as “L”), which is located in the “Seong-gun”.

Around May 16, 1988 when the land category was changed on January 13, 1958 to the area conversion on February 10, 1978, and on May 16, 198, 198, M 3514 square meters of a river, the land category of which was changed to the area of each river on May 16, 198 and the land category of which was changed to the area of 1063 square meters on May 16, 198 to each river - - 5478 square meters of a river of 1657 square meters before N, 1657 - 510 square meters of a river before 1657 - 510 square meters of a river, the land category of which was changed to the area of a river before 3 land P 750 square meters before 7579 square meters prior to 2256 square meters prior to 2256 square meters prior to the date of the change to the area of a river.

B. The circumstances described in the above paragraph (a) have undergone division, land category change, area-unit conversion, etc. as follows:

C. On April 16, 1931, S, who had the legal domicile of the plaintiffs in the "Masung U, was deceased and succeeded to the family head and the property of the Republic of Korea, and V died on September 6, 1979 and succeeded to the property of the plaintiff A, B (A), C (A), D (A), E (A), F (A), G (A) and non-party B, X (A) jointly succeeded to the property of V.

On September 11, 1979, the above X jointly succeeded to the X’s property by Plaintiff H (C), I (M), J (M) and K (C). The above W died on September 11, 2002, and the Plaintiffs jointly succeeded to W’ property.

Specific succession process and inheritance shares of the plaintiffs' property are as shown in the attached Form 3.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, Gap evidence Nos. 15 through 19 (including additional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff had already received a final and conclusive judgment on the land of this case Nos. 1 through 4.

arrow