beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Forms 3, 19 and 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written in the following forms:
Based on the statistical income of 3 to 4 years of experience conducted and published by the Ministry of Employment and Labor, the plaintiffs asserted that the amount of income of the deceased should be calculated based on the statistical income of the deceased, which was conducted and published by the Ministry of Employment and Labor, and of 1 year of experience. However, it is not sufficient to recognize that the testimony of the witnesses of the Party A and the witness of the Party G alone could have earned more than the plaintiffs' assertion if the deceased did not have any accident in this case, and there is no other evidence to support this, the plaintiffs' primary and conjunctive arguments should not be accepted.
Funeral expenses damages: 1,650,000 won (=3,000,000 x 55%)] The first instance court's 5th to 16th shall be conducted as follows.
“A. If so, the Defendant, as to the Plaintiff, raised a dispute over the existence or scope of the Defendant’s obligation to perform as to the Plaintiff, from February 24, 2015 to February 24, 2015, with respect to the Plaintiff A, KRW 103,816,60 won for funeral expenses of KRW 1,650,000 for inheritance, KRW 5,000 for funeral expenses of KRW 1,650,000 for the Plaintiff, KRW 103,816,60 for the Plaintiff B (= inheritance amount of KRW 98,816,600 for the consolation money of KRW 3,000 for the Plaintiff, KRW 2,00,000 for consolation money for the Plaintiff C, and each of the above money for KRW 2,000 for the Plaintiff from February 14, 2015 to October 14, 2016; and the extent of the existence or scope of the Defendant’s obligation to perform as to the Plaintiff and Nonparty