logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.29 2014고단1735
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 2, 1995, at around 00:06, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by the road management agency by operating the vehicle loaded with freight of 11.3 tons on the 2 axis of the above vehicle in excess of 10 tons of the limitation on the weight of the vehicle owned by the Defendant in connection with the Defendant’s business at the road above the 412.5km km at the upstream of the Gyeong-do Highway.

2. The Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on the portion of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8315, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8665, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 2095; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 4777, Jan. 2, 2005; Act No. 83155, Oct. 2, 200) that “if an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2,

3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow