logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.19 2015고단75
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is (1) at the City/Do No. 176 of March 4, 1996, which is instigates in Hanam City around 13:25 of March 4, 1996, the defendant's employee B, in excess of 10 tons of the limitation on loading weight of C vehicle 13.5 tons in relation to the defendant's work, and (2) of the same year.

4. At around 10:55, at the above location, B violated the restriction on vehicle operation of the road management agency by operating the cargo loaded at the 2 axis in excess of 10 tons of the restriction on load capacity of the above vehicle in excess of 11.6 tons.

Judgment

Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Oct. 28, 2010; 2010Hun-Ga14, Oct. 14, 15, 2010; 2015; 201Hun-Ga14, Oct. 28, 2010; 2011; 202. 3. 3. 4. 4. 4. 4. 2. 2. 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. 3. 201; 3. . . . . .. .. ... .. .. .. ... .. .. .. . .. 3.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, is not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

(No public notice of judgment of innocence shall be given in accordance with the proviso of Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act).

arrow