logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.01.06 2016고정1119
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

1. The Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

2. The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 24, 2016, around 00:50, the Defendants got off “E” food in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the front day of the 2016.4.24, due to the victim F (the remaining and the age of 24)’s clicking of a teahouse, Defendant A was able to kill the victim’s breath, and turn off the breath with the hand floor, and Defendant B was able to turn off the victim’s breast with his hand.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victims, such as “brain cerebral fins without any open wife,” which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B, around April 24, 2016, is a clerical error in front of the 11-lane 63 Hong-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul Mapo-gu, Hong-ro, 11-gil, and the victim G ( South, 21 years old) and the facts charged.

The snow was boomed while taking a bath for one another, and the part of the victim was pushed down.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement by the Defendants (as at the second public trial date);

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (elective selection)

B. Defendant B: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury) and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and the choice of each fine

2. Aggravated concurrent crimes: The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.

3. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

4. Taking into account the fact that the Defendants’ grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act were committed against the Defendants in the instant court, and all of the errors were found to have been committed.

arrow