Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and for two million won, each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to a three-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for special robbery, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on August 13, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 21, 2014, and was during the suspended sentence period.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendants committed a joint crime on October 5, 2017, on the grounds that they were friendly and fluenced by dividing the conversation between the victim F(27 tax) who was the front side of the E-cafeteria located in D in the original city around October 5, 2017 and G by large sound.

At this time, Defendant A did not participate in the netization and got her clocks from the victim's head at one time, and Defendant B got her clocks from the victim's head, and Defendant B got her clocks up to the floor by laying down the victim's F's bridge.

As such, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim, such as salted tensions and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant A, at the same time and place as above, had the victim G (27 years old) who tried to see the Defendant who assaulted F, as above, she saw the victim’s her hand by her hand, and her blick up with the victim’s blocks.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. Two on-site photographs, two diagnosis reports, and each investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal history;

1. Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (in the case of Defendant A, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act) concerning the crime

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant A), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) (hereinafter “Defendant A”) is that the Defendant is pening his mistake in depth.