logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.04.13 2016고정153
공중위생관리법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Any person who intends to conduct a public sanitary business shall be equipped with facilities and equipment prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare for each type of public sanitary business and shall report it to the competent authority.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not report to the competent authorities on August 2014, to August 19, 2015, installed convenience facilities, such as fee, fee, air conditioners, etc., in the Seo-gu TT in Gwangju, Seo-gu, and provided accommodation charges to unspecified customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. U’s written statement;

1. Application of the statutes related to V (glamping) photographs and V-related Internet data;

1. Article 20(1)1 of the former Public Health Control Act (amended by Act No. 13596, Dec. 22, 2015; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the former Public Health Control Act (amended by Act No. 13596, Dec. 2, 2015); the former part of Article 3(1); and the selection of fines, etc.

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (Conversion of KRW 100,000 per day) to the custody of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence of sentence of the Criminal Act [the Defendant did not have any provision on the registration of camping ground business under the Tourism Promotion Act (amended on February 3, 2015) on August 8, 2014, for which the instant place of business began to conduct a clamping business in the above place of business, and thereafter, the Defendant attempted to lawfully operate a camping ground business under the Tourism Promotion Act, but it appears that the registration was not completed due to a dispute with the competent administrative agency (the Defendant asked the Ministry of Culture and Tourism about the registration of camping ground business, and the request for registration was made after the dispute with the Seo-gu Metropolitan City Office in Gwangju Metropolitan City.)

section 3.

The defendant is recently found to have lost the defendant in the first instance trial and won in the appellate trial, as a dispute related to the restoration of the original state of the relevant administrative litigation-related facilities (a swimming pool, water play facilities, toilets, and wood cream facilities) between the head of Seo-gu in Gwangju Metropolitan City.

arrow