Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2019, the Defendant: (a) contacted the phone number from which the text message on the loan was sent by a person without a name who assumes the office head of B Company C, and asked the person without a name to “be able to grant the loan even if the credit level is low; and (b) from the person without a name to the name, it is possible to grant a loan at an amount that is desired to increase the details of the deposit. However, if the Defendant’s account number is known, it is possible to deposit the money in cash and deliver it to the employee.” (c) consented to the proposal that “The number of the Association (E) in the name of the Defendant was known to the person without a name.”

On the other hand, on April 30, 2019, the victim F of the victim’s false statement to the effect that the victim F of the loan was “to make a loan at a low interest rate if he/she redeems the existing loan to the account known to him/her.” On May 2, 2019, the victim, at around 12:57, remitted the sum of KRW 15 million to the above D Association account under the name of the defendant, and around 14:12 on the same day, KRW 25 million to the above account.

The Defendant did not accurately identify the information about the company or the person in charge of the lending, and explained that the lending was made with false transaction records, so it could sufficiently be aware that the lending was not a normal loan. In the process of cash withdrawal, the Defendant received and read the documents to prevent scamsing, and therefore, the cash delivered by the Defendant can be the damage amount to the crime of scamsing fraud.

Nevertheless, at around 13:12 on May 2, 2019, the Defendant requested an employee who was unable to know his name at the H main points located in Gangwon-gun G, Gangwon-gun to withdraw KRW 13 million out of the amount deposited in the said account, and the Defendant’s withdrawal of the large amount of cash is doubtful from the employee of the headquarters of the Association.