beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around February 26, 2019, the Defendant received a letter of loan advertisement from a person who was named in the name of the deceased (hereinafter “B leader”) (hereinafter “the name of the team leader”) and sent a phone-based contact with D and a person who was named in the name of the deceased. To grant a loan, the Defendant made a transaction record for the loan. If the Defendant’s account number is known, he/she shall withdraw money to the said account in cash and deliver it to the employee, and then notified the Defendant’s name E-bank account (F) to the above person who was named in the name of the deceased.
On the other hand, on the other hand, on February 26, 2019, the person under whose name the victim was named as “a loan to a low interest rate if an existing loan is repaid to the account known to him/her,” by calls from the victim G at the phone number of the H call number. On the other hand, the victim transferred KRW 4,720,000 to the above E bank account in the name of the defendant on the same day, and around February 28, 2019, KRW 20,000 to the above E bank account in the name of the defendant.
The Defendant did not accurately inquire about the information about the company’s information or the person in charge of the lending, and explained that it was made false transaction records for the lending, so it was sufficiently recognizable that it was not a normal loan. After receiving the D message from the above person in bad name, he was well aware that the Defendant released the money due to any reason different from the fact, such as questioning the person in bad name, “The purpose of cash is to be a riverland,” and then, he thought that the cash delivered by the Defendant can be the amount of damage caused by the crime of Bosing fraud, because he was issued the documents preventing phishing and read the documents during the withdrawal.
Nevertheless, according to the direction of the above, the defendant is a bank at the location of the E Bank, which is located in the Kangwon-gun L on February 28, 2019, around 13:05.