All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of the Defendants’ recognition of each crime of unfair sentencing as to the Defendants’ assertion of unfair sentencing, and the fact that the Defendants reflects the mistakes, and the Defendants did not reach the age of majority at the time of each crime, the Defendants are already subject to juvenile protective disposition several times due to habitual larceny, special larceny, violence, etc., up to the trial, damage recovery or agreement with the victims was not reached, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendants’ character and conduct, family environment, motive, background, means, method, and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment (two years of imprisonment and fine of KRW 300,000,000) is appropriate and too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals by the Defendants are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, in the part of the judgment below ordering the return of the "Disposition", "No. 609 of the same branch office" is a clerical error of "30,000 won in the disposal of No. 1 of the annual list of seized articles No. 609 of the same branch office in 2013, which was seized", and the "AF" of the 6th sentence in "the summary of evidence" is a clerical error of "A Q", and the part of "AF" of the attached Form No. 11 attached to the judgment of the court below is a clerical error of "No. 4,16: 560,00 won" in the "No. 4,16: 260,00 won" and "No. 16:1,260,00 won" in the "No. 60,000," and the part of "the correction of the Criminal Procedure Act" is clearly omitted ex officio pursuant to Article 219 or 225 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

.