beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 2,500,000, respectively.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
1) A is an owner of a business who operates a non-registered loan company with no trade name in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C Building 202.
Defendant
2) B is an employee of the above-registered loan company called “D director”.
Defendant
A employed Defendant B in order to run a unregistered loan business, and ordered Defendant B to pay largephones and large-sized vehicles purchased from an unspecified person and to carry out loans directly by the debtor and to work as an employee who is recovered from the loan.
Defendant
A set up a loan advertisement with the Internet NVber E and contacted the debtors who reported it to contact with the Defendant B, and received personal documents, such as the abstract of the resident registration, family relation certificate, personal identification certificate, and copy of the identification card necessary for the loan from the obligor, and made the loan contract, loan certificate, loan certificate, and power of attorney together with the obligor, and ordered the obligor to prepare the name, occupation (company name), telephone number (company name), residence, class, etc. of the obligor to secure the repayment of the obligation, and to prepare the “basic personal information” document prepared in advance, and sign it from the obligor.
1) A person who intends to engage in loan business shall file for registration with the head of the competent administrative agency having jurisdiction over the relevant place of business.
Defendant
A According to the records of “crime list” that: (a) from August 20, 2017 to August 20, 2017, Defendant B was placed in the Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, and Incheon, with one of F’s largephones and one of G Sspke vehicles and met the debtor by using it; (b) the debtor I was “J”, “K”, “M”, and “N” as “N,” respectively, and “20,000 won” of interest Nos. 81 each time. The debtor’sO was the same person (as the debtor’sO Nos. 18 and 65 and 666).