logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.04.29 2013구합57457
사업비 산정
Text

1. Between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff exceeding KRW 34,429,80,000, out of the land indicated in the separate sheet, and KRW 45,049.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The head of the Ulsan-do regional maritime port office (hereinafter “the head of the Ulsan-do regional port office”) determined that “the construction of the Ulsan-do New Port Development (1-2 phase) local port area” (hereinafter “the construction of the Nam-do port area”) in the front sea of the Ulsan-do, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, is to be conducted by private enterprises, and on December 27, 2005, the head of the Ulsan-do regional port office (hereinafter “the head of the Ulsan-do regional port office”).

B. The construction project of the Southern Port District means a landing area with a facility to anchor a ship within a harbor, which is executed by the Plaintiff, which is filled by reclaiming the sea to create a landing facility and a site behind the port.

The approximate total project cost of the opening was 84.4 billion won (4.4 billion tin, 43.3 billion tin, 5 tin, 41.1 billion tin), and the construction period was 4 years from 2006 to 2009.

On the other hand, the reasons why the applicants for the designation of the non-management authority of the above non-management authority is that the project should commence and complete the project within the appropriate period designated by the Korean government for the purpose of budget reduction and smooth implementation of the project, unless there is a natural disaster, and if the project has been hindered in the implementation of the project, such as the increase of construction cost of another project operator due to the delay of process, etc., all legal and administrative sanctions such as the designation of the project operator and the cancellation of the permission for the implementation of the project shall be taken, and the project operator shall not raise any objection thereto.

C. The Plaintiff organized a consortium with Samsung Heavy Industries (hereinafter “Tsung Heavy Industries”), and participated in the process of selecting a project implementer for the construction of the Southern Sea Zone. The head of Ulsan Port Administration (hereinafter “instant construction project”) selects the Plaintiff and Samsung Heavy Industries consortium as the project implementer of the construction project No. 4 and No. 5 on June 27, 2006 (hereinafter “instant construction project”), and the former Harbor Act on August 5, 2006.

arrow