(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.01.15 2014구합1646

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.01.15 2014구합1646

울산신항 화물 취급에 대한 권리 확인

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 27, 2005, the head of the Ulsan-do Maritime Affairs and Port Office of Ulsan-si changed the name of the non-management authority of the project operator of the project of the project of the construction of the Ulsan-do Magsan Port (1-2 phase) in the Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si. The head of the Sinsan-do Maritime Affairs and Port Office changed the name of the non-management authority of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project of the project.

On February 13, 2006, the head of the Ulsan Regional Maritime Affairs and Port Office appointed the Plaintiff, etc. as the project implementer of the instant wharf construction project.

tin Project operator’s project cost (Contents) 9, the main body of which belongs to the project cost (amounting to a million won), 240 m2 (DW 1 m20,000), the reinforcement (L=260m), the reinforcement of the pen-to-land inside the wall of the wall-to-debris protection (L-260m), 1-type 37,473, and the entire state of the site.

B. On June 27, 2006, the Administrator of the Ulsan-si Maritime Affairs and Port Office granted permission to implement harbor works to the non-managing authority of the instant wharf, and the details are as follows.

C. On August 21, 2007, the head of the Ulsan-si Maritime Affairs and Port Office notified the Plaintiff, etc. of the purport that “The Plaintiff, etc. shall seek to review the scope of the State’s attribution on the instant wharf, and the Plaintiff, etc. on the same day.”

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2015.01.15 2013구합1328

-서울행정법원 2014.04.29 2013구합57457

-울산지방법원 2015.1.15.선고 2013구합1328 판결

-서울행정법원 2019.06.20 2018구합69134

-울산지방법원 2015.1.15.선고 2014구합1646 판결