logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.01.15 2013구합1328
취급화물제한처분취소
Text

1. On April 10, 2013, the Defendant’s timber pool stipulated in the basic harbor plan, the basic harbor plan, and the permission for execution of harbor works.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 27, 2005, the Defendant: (a) made a public announcement of the designation of a non-management authority of the Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. Construction Project for the Southern Port (1-2) (the title of the Plaintiff is changed; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) on the project implementer; and (b) formed a consortium with the East Pulp Co., Ltd., and the Sejong Pulp Co., Ltd., Ltd. (the title of the Plaintiff was changed to the Plaintiff; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) with the Sulp Co., Ltd., the name of the consortium was changed to a M&P Co., Ltd., Ltd.; (c) Sejong Pulp Co., Ltd., Ltd., the name of the consortium was changed to the Taeho-si Terminal Pulp Korea Terminal Co., Ltd., Ltd.; and (d) on May 2010, the members of the consortium was changed to the Defendant, regardless of the title of the Plaintiff’s participation in the construction project in the Taeho P&P Korea Terminal.

Accordingly, on February 13, 2006, the defendant selected the plaintiff et al. as the project implementer of the instant wharf construction work.

tin Project operator’s project cost (Contents) 9, the main body of which belongs to the project cost (amounting to a million won), 240 m2 (DW 1 m20,000), the reinforcement (L=260m), the reinforcement of the pen-to-land inside the wall of the wall-to-debris protection (L-260m), 1-type 37,473, and the entire state of the site.

B. On June 27, 2006, the Defendant issued a permit to implement harbor works to the non-management authority of the instant wharf to the Plaintiff, etc., and the details are as follows.

C. On August 21, 2007, the defendant notified the plaintiff et al. of the purport that "to review the scope of the State's attribution on the wharf of this case" and the plaintiff et al. requested the defendant to present his opinion on the same day. The whole of the "sea walls and lots" shall be the State's non-Reversion, water area facilities (sea route, line length, box, etc.).

arrow